Answers To Queries., Daily Racing Form, 1910-11-04


view raw text

ANSWERS TO QUERIES W W Toronto Ont The wager on Descomnets lost lostG G W E Indianapolis Ind 1296 in all Includ ¬ ing the money bet betC C H Louisville Ky The bet was run for by Danger Mark and lost lostJoseph Joseph H C Kansas City Mo The bet lost on Amalfl Had he run second it would have won wonII II J Buffalo N Y It was C De Witts Heath crbloom that ran in race 92630 not E B Cassatts Heatberbroom HeatberbroomMichael Michael M Chicago There was no separate place and show lietting Had there been it would have b fll quoted E T C Kansas City Mo 1 It docs not The horse bet on must win or run to the place for which it is backed 2 Cannot pass opinions on the merits of systems none being of more than occasional temporary value valueG G A K Cincinnati O Cannot say it not being clear what the qualification in regard to Relluf meant If the bets were paid for when made there was enough coming to make rue bet on Relluf If they were credit bets there was not notUKhard UKhard S Chicago 1 New Orleans papers pub ¬ lish entries but not charts 2 A full explanation with examples will be contained in the American Racing Manual of 1911 which will l e published iarly In January The terriis mean two or more horses bunched and sold as one horse under the term lield

Persistent Link:
Local Identifier: drf1910110401_2_4
Library of Congress Record: