view raw text
ANSWERS TO QUERIES G E B Chicago III Seemingly not See reply to H H HFoster Foster St Louis Mo There was no action on horse B BA A E L Louisville Ky 1 No A limit has nothing to do with the matter 2 Yes yes Having accepted the wager the layer should pay payIT IT K Chicago 111 King Avondale raced in several ownerships in 190S and 1009 J Bean V W Powers William Garth and H Penny figuring in that capacity capacityInquirer Inquirer Dayton O When one makes a place or show parlay and there is no price against one of the horses the parlay is void as to that one and stands on the others othersWm Wm H S Chicago 111 One parlay hav ¬ ing been paid for and the others being a contingent if coming parlay it certainly appears that you won two separate wagers wagersU U G Detroit Mich At Latonia October 24 of last year Fantochc and Sway ran a dead heat at a mile and threesixteenths The dead heat was run off and Fantoche A Subscriber Kenosha Wis A was en ¬ titled to a won place bet The present cus ¬ tom is that a wager on one horse of a coupled entry is on the entry with that horse to go or no bet betL L F S St Louis Mo No date is set for the ending of the Tijuana meeting Last year the meeting covered 130 days of racing and terminated on Sunday April 23 Prob ¬ ably something of the same sort is to be
