view raw text
ANSWERS TO QUERIES Communications without names and addresses of senders will not be answered or noticed nor will any answers be sent by mail E T II Chicago The wager was a draw E D N and others Cincinnati O See reply to Cy S in issue of April 21 21R R R II Milwaukee Wis See reply to Cy S in Daily Racing Form of April 21 21J J II Toronto Out The bet on Sanguine was a draw regardless of where the stable mate finished finishedFred Fred S Toronto Out You do not say what the point in dispute Is but seemingly the bookmaker did aa he was directed to do doS S L II Cincinnati 0 A bettor is always en ¬ titled to notification of a special rule and if you were not so notified and had no knowledge of it you should be paid paidJohn John S Chicago True average would be com ¬ puted on all the prices but that Is not the practice of the bookmakers they always computing it on the opening and closing prices pricesJim Jim L St Louis Mo In the absence of a rule that added starters run for the book the bet should be paid at tho average of even money opening at 3 to 5 closing being fair prices with Restigouche deducted deductedG G II Chicago Mazuma was not an added starter and was regularly entered else It being a purse race he could not have started Backers of the other horses lost as they would have done in any race in which the horse of their choice failed to win
