view raw text
; . ; i- PERCENTAGES OF WINNING FAVORITES IN THE PAST TWO YEARS 4 The racing of 101.! was attended by exactly the same percentage of winning favorites as in 1012. the 1013 average for all the American tracks being .41, as compared with .41 in 1012, .40 in 1011, .42 in 1010, .4:: in 100!. .40 in 100S. .SO in 1007 and .41 in 1000. Taking the entire racing field and considering it sec-tionally, it will be found that as in 1012, the tracks yielding allegiance to the Canadian Racing Associations made an excellent showing in this respect, the average for Woodbine, Hamilton. Dine Ronnets. Fort Erie and Windsor running close to .40. The lirst-named three of these tracks ran especially high. Woodbine leading with the phenomenal average of .54. The best percentage recorded at any track in the country where racing went on for any considerable period is to the credit of Havre de Grace, where 50 ier cent, of the favorites won. Laurels percentage a as also high and the Maryland tracks as a whole figure slightly in excess of .40. Tlie Kentucky tracks Lexington, Churchill Downs. Douglas Park and Latonia made a showing of .3S, a- compared with .39 in 1012. The combined percentage of the tracks comprising the Inter-Mountain circuit Rutte, Anaconda and Coeur dAlene was a fraction less than .30, as compared with .39 during tlie pievious year. The following comparative ligures of results on American tracks over which racing was conducted in each of the past two years will undoubtedly prove of some interest: ; i i . 1912. Track. f 3 2f Qn If gand o o 2 a- S g ? s : 31 g . SO B : : : : Juarez 01S 232 100 220 .IIS j.Iaiueslown 215 SI 4S S7 .3S Latonia 25S 100 4:: 100 .41 Pimlico 175 S3 111 01 .47 Diifferin Park 112 : 22 51 .35 i Lexington 145 53 :!! 55 .:17 King Ldward Park SS 40 2:: 25 .45 Churchill Downs 141 5", 32 50 .37 Marlboro OS 22 IS 2S .32 Fort Erie 00 40 10 40 .40 woodbine Park Toronto 05 45 IS ."52 .47 , Klue Ronnets Montreal 100 .! 27 .!0 .30 Windsor 100 4 t 23 33 .44 Anaconda S4 23 27 34 .27 Hamilton 100 45 25 30 .lii Tulsa 3Q - ;M IS 30 .33 Rutte 180 77 37 00 .43 Coeur dAlene 334 130 S5 II.". .41 Laurel 104 01 37 00 .37 Deloriinier Park 100 44 IS 44 .42 Iiillcrest Park 10S 40 22 40 .37 Mineral Springs 34 10 0 0 .50 Iirookliue IS fl 3 0 .50 Ill. I hints Del. Ter.l. 27 15 5 7 .50 Meadow Itrook ISwl.Tw ..ID - 0 V 3 .00 Piping Rock IT 7 5 5 .41 Chariest, n 47S 100 120 150 .42 iilavre de Grace 170 72 51 52 .11 Electric Park 71 20 24 21 .37 Kenning 1- S 3 I .07 Douglas Park 10S 47 25 3li .44 Great Neck 0 3 2 I .50 White .Marsh 10 S 1 1 .SO Millbrook 0 4 2 0 .G7 Grand Totals and Pet.. 4.33S 1.747 1,017 1.575 .40 Three dead heats. fXo betting on one race. JOne dead heat. i 1913. c: Track. S of of Qo n o o 2 g f g2 . l . n Juarez 073 224. 177 272 .33 Jamestown 100 S3 30 72 .44 Latonia 254 03 40 112 .37 Pimlico 103 00 30 04 .37 Dufferin Park 110 42 25 50 .30 Lexington 121 52 35 35 .43 King Edward Park ... 04 37 25 32 .30 Churchill Downs 141 55 32 54 .30 Marlboro 02 20 10 17 .42 Fort Erie OS 3S 21 39 .30 Woodbine Park Toronto OS 53 14 31 .54 Rlue Ronnets Montreal OS 47 22 29 .48 Windsor OS 35 24 39 .30 Anaconda OS 32 27 39 .H3 Hamilton OS 44 27 27 .45 Tulsa 244 112 50 70 .40 Rutte ISO 74 34 72 .41 Coeur dAlene 374 133 05 140 .30 Laurel 1G3 70 34 53 .40 Delorimier Park 100 41 2S 32 .41 Iiillcrest Park 113 3S 29 40 .34 .Mineral Springs 122 50 20 37 .4S Rrookline 24 IS 3 3 75 Un. Hunts Rel. Tor.. IS 7 7 4 .30 Meadow Rrook Rel.Ter. i 22 12 -- 0 1 .55 Piping Rock 33 17 0 10 .53 Charleston 405 214 110 171 .43 Havre de Grace 1S1 101 43 37 .50 Electric Park 00 24 11 25 .40 Kenning 20 0 2 ! .45 Douglas Park 130 41 3S 57 .32 fGreat Neck 7 4 2 0 .07 White Marsh 0 5 1 0 .S3 Millbrook 5 3 1 1 .00 Grand Totals and Pet.. 4.70S 1,012 1.10 1 1,005 .41 Dead heat. fNo betting; walkover.
