Reasons Why Green and Co. Barred., Daily Racing Form, 1917-06-12

article


view raw text

REASONS WHY GREEN and CO. BARRED. Here ;if" samples of Green and Companys statement in adirt isenoiit and the facts for one day. Tuesday. May 22, taken haphazard, during tin- term Ml ] 22 27, straight betting only and on Louisville and Jamaica only. Facts. Treasure Trove. Jamaica Ll 24 Lost G. M. Milhr. Jamaica 2-1 Lost Miss Krater, Jamaica Scratched Pallax, Jamaica M-5 Lost Corydoa, Jamaica "■_• 1 Won Jocular, Louisville 4.80 to 1 Lost Charley Noite, Louisville 4.55 to 1 Lost Bea Bampsoa, LoahnriUe 3.95 to 1 Lost opportunity. LsafanriBe 3.70 to 1 Lost Ebony. Louisville 1.28 to 1 Lost Irish ;• ntleman. LoaisviBc 2.95 to 1 Lost Brioghurst, Loahnrille Scratched Won. 50, Lost. .vino. Nit loss. |BM. Advertisement. Corydoa, Jamaica 50 Won Ebony. Louisville 100 Last Tarahera, Toronto i::o Won Hampton Dane. Tor. uto 2M Won Won May L2 8588 Lost May 22 KM Net won .siso Greea and Company did not send Western subscribers the las! two horses. They did Hie tin la with Daily Kaeing Form. In their advertising statement, however, they did not mention the Sinn. which in each ease would hare been lost to Hunl and Laser on Treasure Trove. G. M. Miller. Pulliix. Jocular, Charley Nsite, Hen Hampaoa, Opportunity sad lii h Genth man in all 800. Oae sabscriber bet 85 on ten and lost on nine. or 845 lot and 2.50 Corydoa won. a net loss on tin- day. as per the instructions, of 2.30. In the advertising statement Greea «V Company displayed tic won on Tarahera ami Hampton Dame. it Toroato, but did not display the 98 lost ■ mi Loaise Stone, Hasten, Crimper. Rhomb and Suilt hn at the same e ■ .•. Neither did Green A Company display tic results at Montreal hut Lady t apricioas, BaBie tiD.iv, Marie OBriea, Loyal Meteor. Tactless, Dominion Park and Lieutenant Sawyer. As a matter of fact. SlOO bet on each of the horses at Montreal would have caused a loss of 1815. May L*J was merely a sample day. too; when Green St Company covered the full racing card to Daily Kaeing i-orm. In no case were Greea and Companys shifty advertised promises to refund clients money — after failure and upon demand complied with.


Persistent Link: https://drf.uky.edu/catalog/1910s/drf1917061201/drf1917061201_2_5
Local Identifier: drf1917061201_2_5
Library of Congress Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/unk82075800