Answers to Queries., Daily Racing Form, 1910-04-01


view raw text

ANSWERS TO QUERIES. It. A. W.. Nashville. Tenn. Neither horse being placed, the bet was a draw. 1. R.. Cincinnati. l. Tta bet was a draw, there being no separate place betting. .1. J.. Hamilton, tint. It is for the jiersons concerned to settle such controversies. .1. .1. p.. Chicago, if the taakaaatei accepted such a hack action hot, be should pay it. R. L. It.. Chiraajn, The bet lost. If your horse hail finished first you would have been paid. W. V. C. Cincinnati. O. No. However, the practice is not uniform and sonic layers pay under such circumstances. F. J. J.. Chicago. The horse opened at 5 to 1 ami was never lietter than ti to 1. Your insinuation is beneath contempt.

Persistent Link:
Local Identifier: drf1910040101_1_15
Library of Congress Record: