view raw text
MOST SUCCESSFUL TRAINERS OF 1915. For the fourth year in succession it fell to II. G. Bedwell to Save as the leading trainer of North America in re pect to number of winning horses sent to the p ist. It is the result of racing a big band of low-class horses able to win when placed right, and no one excels him in good judgment in placing h - horses where thev stand a more than coed chance to win. In 1914 be saddled eighty-l - iii- u liner-, but did still lietter in 1915 with ninety-seven. However, bis liest record was in 1909, when he had 1U2 races won to his credit. S. :;c| in Bedwell and pressing him closely for the leadership was .lames Arthur, ■ trainer who can 1 repare a horse as well as any man in his profession. II,- was third to Bedwell and T. J. Healer In 1914, but made a material advance in 1915, Mr. Healey dropping back to fifth place. Tbe Virginia trainer. L. W. Garth, had a good year, and brought up in third place, but only bad an advantage of one winner over S. . Hildreth. No better trainer Uvea than the latter and it was due to his skill that the Belmont horses made such a good showing la the campaign of 1915. T. J. Healey. J. Fitmaimmons, W. H. Baker and F. I. Weir were the other trainers who saddled forty or more winners. In the Impotent matter of money WOO by horses la his charge. James Bowe was the years leader with a total of 179.596. Following him in order were H. G. Bedwell. Sol. 015: S. C. Hildreth. 950.343; .lames Arthur. 949.940; T. I. He.-. lev. 941.850; G. Denny. 3,589: A. J. Goldsorough. 930,715 and All., rt Simons, 990,015, the horses in no .ther trainers charge winning as attach as 930.490. The trainers of 1915 who sent ten or BJOTC win-aocs to the post were the following: Trainer. Wins. Won. Between, H. G P7 1,019 Arthur. .1 88 49.940 ..it Hi. L. W 53 32.483 Hildreth. S. C .".4 50.343 Healey. T. J ."".:; 11.850 Fitzsimmons. J ."il 27.890 Baker, v. n 41 23.703 Weir. F. D 40 17.394 Denny, G 39 33.589 Spence. K 39 28.313 Lowe. John 37 14.328 Schorr. J. F 30 20.953 Um-nsetter. J 34 Hi. 701 Sin ..u-. A Lit 30.015 Heffne:. K. W 29 28.635 Henderson. S. M 28 14,619 Walker. W 28 13.411 Casser. C. W 28 !».1.".0 Benson. R. 0 27 22, 949 Shannon. T. J 27 22.095 Larrick. B. B 27 21.045 BurtUcUell, W. A 27 13.83 ; [ j | j ] ] J ■ 1 ! , | j | 1 1 1 J j , ] I | | j 1 I t 1 i i | I ] i 1 j I | ! J j , | : I , i j j . j , ! Trainer. Win-. Won. Short. W 27 ,595 Coldshoroi-gh. A. J 20 30.715 Karrick, W. II. 20 21.098 Perkins. W 24 22.089 Hirseh, M 24 14.055 Casey. C. J 24 12,355 Westmoreland, W. C 24 9.050 McDaniel, H 23 17.785 Midgley. W. R 23 17.010 Fitzgerald, E. L 23 7.330 McKinney, y. A 23 7,240 Young, W. J 22 22.095 Austin, A. L 22 20,540 Weston. A. J 22 15.475 Brandt. II. R 21 23,610 Whyte. E 21 10.750 Sheridan. P 21 12.295 McDaniel, W 21 12.116 Bucknor. W. H 21 10.530 Goodman, .T. B 21 0.670 Striker. 1 21 6.655 Randolph. J 21 5,855 Lester, R 21 5,500 Colton. L T 20 12.259 Goldblatt, II 20 9,819 Cain. W. M 20 7.231 Whelan, E 20 6,495 Rowe. James 19 75.596 McCormack, J 19 10,655 Whalen, J 1» 9.805 Foster, F. fct 19 7.815 Phillips. J It 6,500 Freeman. . N 19 5.610 Crippen. C. W 19 4.095 Carman. It. F IS 10.063 Martin, W. T IS 13.925 Brady. M 18 12,335 Stockier. J 18 9,702 Hughes, H 18 8.525 Strate, G. H IS 8,020 Judge. S 18 6,515 Carter, R. D IS 5,620 Hill, D 18 5.490 Lewis, w is 5.470 Dily, M 17 14.755 bewte, J. H 17 12.S40 Hodge, T 17 11,554 Respess, J. B. 17 11.186 Hedrick. ,L Y 17 8.070 Strode, J. A 17 7,575 Tucker, J 17 5.875 Dayton, A. F 17 5. son Hammon. C 16 16,042 Owens, J 10 15.220 Cunningham. K 16 9.165 Bryson. O. R 16 7.590 Powers. Jerry 10 7.277 Hatfield. T 10 6,470 tterback, E 10 5.980 Haymaker, L. lO 4.210 Gibson, R 10 3,925 Parker, J. W 16 3,795 Ward. J. S 15 14.797 Walker, W. S 15 14.025 Coyne. P 15 10.928 Littlefield, B. T 15 9.002 Krayling. J. K 15 s,ij70 Everman, J. S 15 8.575 Foucon. E 15 7.755 Hopkins. W 15 7.425 OConnell. E. J 15 0,961 Howser. S. R 15 6.050 Miles, P.J 15 6.108 King. W. F 15 4.576 Short. E. n 15 4.150 Ripley. R 15 3.835 Valentine, A. L 15 3,820 Healy. J. S 14 10.575 May. J. W 14 10.350 Farrar, F 14 8.2.0 Maker. A. 14 7.614 Kocnc, ;. II 14 7,275 Preston, M , 14 0.965 Breater. A. R 14 0.220 Daly. M. J 14 :,.940 Bnehart. F 14 3.632 McCarthy, J 14 3.535 Seed, A 14 3.387 Herold. F. A 14 5.345 Bonrigb, O. P 14 3.067 Hayes, T. P If 12.879 Lambert. J 13 11 .910 Leary, I. J 13 10.715 Gallaher, J. C 13 10. 1 To Giovannetti, A 13 9,229 Adkins, J. I 13 9,152 Milam, J. 0 13 8.728 Lewis. W. I 13 8.500 Trotter. E 13 8,417 Williams, R. D 13 8.211 Ownbey. J. S 13 7,440 Riddick, J 13 6.560 Powers. John 13 0.5S3 Tigue. J 13 4.750 Brenton. G. C 13 3.365 Capps. W. C 13 3,910 Carroll. C. W 13 5.650 Wimmer. P 12 10,107 Stewart. D. E 12 7.870 Bdwards. J 12 6,975 Goodo, J. M 12 6,931 Byer. N 12 6.275 Martin. W 12 0.175 Reed. J. H 12 5,923 riser, W. H 12 5.748 Parsons, E. B 12 5.455 White, R. A 12 5,020 Staton, F 12 4,892 Paul. J. L 12 4.855 Beal, N. K 12 4.600 John ton. J 12 4.510 Vestal, R. N 12 4,230 Neusteter. H 12 4.085 Ramsey. E. J 12 2.S77 Krawk. C 12 3.770 Murph v. J. W 12 2. 752 Patterson, A. E 12 2.735 Mallorv. F 12 2.665 Walters, J It 11.512 May-berry, J. P 11 6.490 Odom. G. M 11 6,145 Daniels. C. B 11 5.490 Misiek. J. D 11 4.840 Shilling. J. M 11 4.309 Cheek. T 11 4.030 Dickinson, R. P 11 3,921 Picket-son. R 11 3.899 Suggs. AY. E 11 3,425 Stowe, J. M 11 2,985 Jones. B. A 11 2.7S0 Mason, L. L 11 2.700 Brown, R. G 11 2,110 Shields. M 11 1.S90 Campbell. G. W 11 4.220 Feasted. L 10 5.783 Hou-an. J 10 5.131 Gass, J 10 4.890 I.owenstein. M 10 4.850 Blakelev. A. 10 4.780 Salt. E. J 10 4,530 Baird. F. E 10 4.395 Poland. G. H 10 3.S50 Freeman. D. B 10 3.283 Airhart, H. C 10 2.585 Debolt. W. II 10 2.200