view raw text
ANSWERS TO QUERIES. D. G., Indianapolis. Ind. It was a losing transaction. John F.. Toronto, Out. Ripostas show price in i the race named was 7 to 10 ami settlement should j be on that basis. F. V.. Cincinnati, O. The horses were coupled . because trained by the same man. It is a thing that seems frequently. If a man backed the entry I ; any member of the entry starling ran for him. Had it won he would have been entitled to payment. In its losing the backer lost also. F. S., Chicago. Brighouse had belonged to T. Hatfield, but had been sold liefore his race of February 4 and Jake Argent was all that Hatfield had in the race. Also it was a selling race in which an owner could start but one horse, for which , reason the two horses were not coupled in the entries published in Daily Racing Form.
