Answers to Queries, Daily Racing Form, 1906-08-21

charts and information


view raw text

ANSWERS TO QUERIES. Communications without names and addresses of senders will not be answered or noticed. C. D., Chicago. In all you should have been paid 1.33. Pcvenson, Minneapolis, Minn. The wager on Pope Joan lost. J. C. II., Chicago. Having once been notified of the rule was sufficient, and no repetition was necessary. J. A. D., Kansas City, Mo. Your wager on Kentucky Beau was not affected by the added starter and lost. H. R.. Cincinnati, O. Since Chief Millikin lost the odds cut no figure in the case unless there was a stipulation as to what the price should be. C. G. B., Chicago. The parlay should be paid as a place bet on Potter, being void as to Bullfinch and Merllene, because the former was scratched and there was no separate place price against the latter. P. A. B., Chrcago. 1 A parlay bet is decided strictly by the running of the horses named. 2 Had the bet been on Okenitc alone. It would also have been a loser, but had he been scratched it would have been a draw regardless of where Curriculum finished. Clawson and others, Chicago and elsewhere. Persons who backed the Keene entry in the Hopeful Stakes won. Although not named in the overnight entries, Peter Pan was a part of the Keene entry and legitimately entitled to be named to start at any time up to 40 minutes prior to the start. Those who backed Pope Joan singly lost and would have had draws had she been scratched. In handbook betting McCarters backers are also entitled to payment at reduced odds unless the rule that added starters ran for the book was la force.


Persistent Link: https://drf.uky.edu/catalog/1900s/drf1906082101/drf1906082101_1_10
Local Identifier: drf1906082101_1_10
Library of Congress Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/unk82075800