Answers to Queries, Daily Racing Form, 1907-08-09

charts and information


view raw text

ANSWERS TO QUERIES. Communications without names and addresses of senders will not be answered or noticed. Ed II., Cincinnati, O. The parlay lost. B. M.t Chicago. Not If It is sure he knew the result. W. D. P., Chicago. Yes, unless you knew the result. C. K. M., Des .Moines, Iowa. The Running Water bet lost. Alport, Walkervllle, Can. Address Sir Charles Nugent, Cranborne, Dorset. I. R., Chicago. It should bo settled as dead heats are settled and you should receive 1907.sh.50. J. II. J., Cincinnati, O. Manheimor had no connection with your bet. There was no coupled entry. Ben J., St. Louis, Mo. Of course you was included in the decision. Everybody concerned was included. E. J. L., Chicago. The cases differ and the decisions in both cases were right and in the interest of fair dealing. Frank C, St. Louis, Mo. Certainly, unless you had previous knowledge of the race having been run and the result. II. E. IL, Chicago. From the time scored it is evident that the Fort Erie track was not only good, but also fast after the first nice of August!!; T. J. N., Toronto, Out. There is due from the Ostrich scratch, there having been no action on Wexford because there was not enough due to make the stipulated wager. F. W. W., Louisville, Ky. Your wager on Sir Cleges in the sixth Saratoga August 0, became a draw as soon as the colt was scratched and did not follow him when he was put in the Flash Stakes as an added starter. A bookmaker lias no right to make a hot for a patron of which the latter lias no knowledge.


Persistent Link: https://drf.uky.edu/catalog/1900s/drf1907080901/drf1907080901_2_3
Local Identifier: drf1907080901_2_3
Library of Congress Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/unk82075800