Answers to Queries, Daily Racing Form, 1909-09-30

charts and information


view raw text

ANSWERS TO QUERIES. Communications without names and addresses will not bo noticed nor answered. No answers will lie-Rent by mail and none by wire unless, reply prepayment is made at time of wiring query. O. N.. Chicago. The liet on Tortuous was a leser. Jas. E. . Toronto. Out. .00. 15., St. Louis, .Mo. The place let on Roscboro won. A. B. R.. Indianapolis. Ind. The place bet on RoRboro won. M. F.. Chicago. The bet really lost, but sonic lHwkmakers pay such bets. Mr. It., Chicago. The Bedwell entry was the favorite in the first race at Toronto September 25. Al II.. Kansas City. Mo. A limit to a certain price is a controlling factor. In the case presented it was 15 to 1, and the sum due the backer was 1.30. WInibush. Los Angeles, Cal. The reply was on the basis that there was no rule in regard to added starters running for the book. If there was such a rule and the bettor had been notified of it, his wager would be subject to its operation. B. St. Louis, Mo. One horse is an entry. Two or more horses, constitute, for betting, a- coupled entry. When one backs an entry it is almost invariably a coupled entry. So in this case, no horse being named, it is safe. to assume that the coupled Bed-well entry in the fifth race was the one-you meant to back and. that when that entry was scratched, your bet became a draw. J. B.. Cincinnati. O. That parlay won and should be paid. It is a matter of course that if a bookmaker makes up his mind not to pay a bet. there is no way to force him to pay. But the great mass of bookmakers have sufficient sense of honor to steer clear of welching. Because of a death in bis family It. T. Wilson.. Jr.. runs his liorses under the name of the Montpelier Stable.


Persistent Link: https://drf.uky.edu/catalog/1900s/drf1909093001/drf1909093001_2_6
Local Identifier: drf1909093001_2_6
Library of Congress Record: https://lccn.loc.gov/unk82075800