view raw text
OF THEM AIL! £• THE QUALITY CONTRAST between Chesterfield and other leading cigarettes is a revealing story. Recent chemical analyses give an index of good quality for the countrys six leading cigarette brands. The Index of good quality table— a ratio of high sugar to low nicotine — !► shows Chesterfield quality highest N . . . 15% higher than its nearest competitor and Chesterfield quality 31% higher than the average of the fic other leading brands. Quality in Regular and .BWWH--t, King-size . . . much milder j §andffffjm f i 1 I with an extraordinarily good ljjllBand ft 1 J m t % * Ttdfl Mm taste— and for your pocketbook, I-Wmwm %AuMl -" I Civ 1 ill* fw! Chesterfield is todays best sffllllu 1 Mwlj ml ! Vonfyoc/wanf to fry a E 1 3. A Report Never Before j tk fcj Careffemtharecorc//ef/f/s? Made About a Cigarette. I M f ? vMrfVTVVTTV,W FijSt? For a full year a medical spe- / WGARFTTKc* mf£ »/ cialist has been giving a :, ■ 3t Y"*t mIRETTPC group of Chesterfield smokers W V U fg / . regular examinations every mm **rs st.. | I 15? • two months. He reports . . . no 55W8ttteBte«»- Myff5 r°e* : adverse effects to nose, throat and "~ "Sl sinuses from smoking Chesterfield. HftsBj Copyright 1953, Liggett * Myeps Tobacco Co.
